<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed Tasmanian irrigation developments &#8211; update for anglers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riverfly.com.au/proposed-tasmanian-irrigation-developments-and-anglers-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riverfly.com.au/proposed-tasmanian-irrigation-developments-and-anglers-update/</link>
	<description>Fly fishing Tasmania, guiding for wild trout</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:20:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://riverfly.com.au/proposed-tasmanian-irrigation-developments-and-anglers-update/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverfly.com.au/?p=366#comment-98</guid>
		<description>The St Patricks River has been described by many tourist and local anglers alike as &#039;one of the most beautiful streams in Tasmania&#039;. While some may fish it 2 times a year, others may seek enjoyment more than twice a week on this wonderful waterway - a privelige of which they pay for as part of their annual angling licence. 

The Tasmanian Giant Freshwater Crayfish (Astacopsis gouldi) is the largest freshwater invertebrate in the world. The species is only found in  Northern Tasmania, and is listed as a vulnerable species due to habitat loss and over fishing. I have personally observed this species in its natural environment, in the headwaters of the St Patricks River. Quite a significant find really, considering this was fairly juvenille which tends to indicate they are breeding. Also, I have often read that they appear to be more common in the North West.

I for one, don&#039;t wish to see every river in Tasmania dammed in order to create a &#039;food bowl&#039; of exotic, water-hungry crops. Remember also that the &#039;holy grail&#039; of fish in Tasmania, The native Estuary Perch, requires a certain a mix of fresh and salt water to successfully spawn, as do our Bream (Which are known to be some of the biggest in Australia). While many years ago the Estuary Perch was quite common in several Northern estuaries and rivers, it&#039;s now only known to be caught fairly intermittently in one system. I ask the question - How will reducing natural river flows impact our native fish and invertabrate species? 

It seems that those in power have more focus on money, jobs and production than keeping Tasmania&#039;s most iconic and revenue-generating assets in their natural state. 

Damned if we do, Dammed if we don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The St Patricks River has been described by many tourist and local anglers alike as &#8216;one of the most beautiful streams in Tasmania&#8217;. While some may fish it 2 times a year, others may seek enjoyment more than twice a week on this wonderful waterway &#8211; a privelige of which they pay for as part of their annual angling licence. </p>
<p>The Tasmanian Giant Freshwater Crayfish (Astacopsis gouldi) is the largest freshwater invertebrate in the world. The species is only found in  Northern Tasmania, and is listed as a vulnerable species due to habitat loss and over fishing. I have personally observed this species in its natural environment, in the headwaters of the St Patricks River. Quite a significant find really, considering this was fairly juvenille which tends to indicate they are breeding. Also, I have often read that they appear to be more common in the North West.</p>
<p>I for one, don&#8217;t wish to see every river in Tasmania dammed in order to create a &#8216;food bowl&#8217; of exotic, water-hungry crops. Remember also that the &#8216;holy grail&#8217; of fish in Tasmania, The native Estuary Perch, requires a certain a mix of fresh and salt water to successfully spawn, as do our Bream (Which are known to be some of the biggest in Australia). While many years ago the Estuary Perch was quite common in several Northern estuaries and rivers, it&#8217;s now only known to be caught fairly intermittently in one system. I ask the question &#8211; How will reducing natural river flows impact our native fish and invertabrate species? </p>
<p>It seems that those in power have more focus on money, jobs and production than keeping Tasmania&#8217;s most iconic and revenue-generating assets in their natural state. </p>
<p>Damned if we do, Dammed if we don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pterosaur</title>
		<link>http://riverfly.com.au/proposed-tasmanian-irrigation-developments-and-anglers-update/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Pterosaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverfly.com.au/?p=366#comment-97</guid>
		<description>When working on catchment management a few years ago (1999 - 2000 ?)  I did a short review of the upper St. Patrick&#039;s proposal - several endangered species present, both plant and animal - the scheme appeared to be essentially an &quot;ambit&quot; claim and was being proposed by a company based in Scottsdale which specialises in the sale of irrigation equipment.

I am not sure of what the proposed destination for  the water from the proposed scheme is, but assume it may be for irrigating pasture (for dairies) and perhaps vegie growing in the Scottsdale area, given that all the streams around Scottsdale/Ringarooma have been &quot;over allocated&quot;, and also suffer from significant stealing of water by some of the landholders.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When working on catchment management a few years ago (1999 &#8211; 2000 ?)  I did a short review of the upper St. Patrick&#8217;s proposal &#8211; several endangered species present, both plant and animal &#8211; the scheme appeared to be essentially an &#8220;ambit&#8221; claim and was being proposed by a company based in Scottsdale which specialises in the sale of irrigation equipment.</p>
<p>I am not sure of what the proposed destination for  the water from the proposed scheme is, but assume it may be for irrigating pasture (for dairies) and perhaps vegie growing in the Scottsdale area, given that all the streams around Scottsdale/Ringarooma have been &#8220;over allocated&#8221;, and also suffer from significant stealing of water by some of the landholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

